Developmentdevelopment tracker

108-Unit Residential Project Filed for 25 Supertest Street in Charlestown

A development proposal for 108 residential units in Charlestown has entered the Article 80 review process, according to a Boston Planning & Development Agency filing.

The Boston Tea Intelligence DeskMay 29, 2026mediumReviewedRisk: low

What Was Filed

A project at 25 Supertest Street in Charlestown has been submitted under Article 80, the City of Boston's large-project development review process. The filing lists 108 residential units. The current review stage is not specified in the public record.

Where Things Stand

The project is listed on the BPDA's development projects page with a date of May 5, 2026. No additional details about the project's design, developer, or affordability breakdown are available in the current filing record.

What Comes Next

Projects in the Article 80 process typically proceed through BPDA design review and, if zoning relief is needed, a Zoning Board of Appeal hearing. The affordability commitment for any income-restricted units has not yet been publicly established based on available information.

Fact, inference, allegation, question

What the record shows

  • fact

    A development proposal at 25 Supertest Street in Charlestown has been filed under Article 80.

    BPDA development projects listing, bostonplans.org
  • fact

    The project proposes 108 residential units.

    BPDA development projects listing, bostonplans.org
  • fact

    The project is located in the Charlestown neighborhood of Boston.

    BPDA development projects listing, bostonplans.org
  • fact

    The filing is dated May 5, 2026.

    BPDA development projects listing, bostonplans.org
  • fact

    The current Article 80 review stage is not specified in the public record.

    BPDA development projects listing, bostonplans.org
  • inference

    Article 80 projects typically proceed through BPDA design review and may require ZBA approval if zoning relief is needed.

    Standard Boston Article 80 process
  • inference

    An affordability commitment for income-restricted units has not yet been publicly established.

    Absence of such data in the current filing record
For transparency

Editorial assessment

Editorial risk10%
Legal risk5%

Editorial system recommendation: auto publish safe. Publication clears editorial and legal-risk review before going live.

The record

Sources

Methodology & confidence

Every brief is grounded in public records and rated for confidence. Factual claims carry source links, and accountability work passes editorial and legal-risk review before publication. Read how we report and verify in our methodology.

On the map

Related activity

Open map